回复pjv1。

你好Jo，

谢谢你指出这个非常重要的错误。你当然是完全正确的，这是一个编辑错误。我们现在已经在博客中对此进行了修改。

我们只是想强调，在这个博客中表达的意见不是Kent或Athena SWAN团队的官方意见。开云体育app客服

再次感谢您，您的评论很有帮助!< / p > < p > Carin < / p > https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/equalitymatters/is-the-开云体育主頁(欢迎您)university-of-kent-a-meritocracy/#comment-2 pjv1 周一，2019年2月18日10:16:10 +0000 http://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/equalitymatters/?p=21#comment-2 I'm surprised to find an erroneous comment like this in an official Kent blog. "One way of counteracting this is ‘positive discrimination’, set out in the Equality Act (2010, sect 159) as a way of allowing employers to give preference to candidates from underrepresented groups if two candidates are as qualified as each other. Many argue that positive discrimination is just another way of creating inequalities in favour of women instead of men, making it reverse discrimination." The Act specifically outlaws 'positive discrimination' - what's described above is 'positive action'. See below: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06093

我很惊讶在肯特的官方博客里发现这样的错误评论。开云体育app客服

“一种抵消这种情况的方法是“积极歧视”，这在《平等法》(2010年，第159节)中有规定，如果两名候选人的资历相同，雇主可以优先考虑来自代表性不足群体的候选人。许多人认为，积极歧视只是制造有利于女性而不是男性的不平等的另一种方式，使其成为反向歧视。

该法案特别禁止‘积极歧视’& # 8211;上面所描述的是
’积极的行动’

https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06093