Guantánamo博客的评论 https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo 2009年9月30日星期三09:37:25 +0000 每小时 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9 评论“定时炸弹场景”及其酷刑和拘留的折磨逻辑。邀请读者评论…| Guantánamo博客 https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo/2009/09/11/the-ticking-bomb-scenario-and-its-tortured-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-5 酷刑和拘留。邀请读者评论…|关塔纳摩的博客 星期二，29日九月2009 14:33:25 +0000 http://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/cuba/?p=205#comment-5 […]//www.jandeweb.com/guantanamo/2009/09/11/the-ticking-bomb-scenario-and-its-tortured-logic/ [...]

[…] http://bl开云体育app客服ogs.kent.ac。英国/关塔那摩2009/09/11 / the-ticking-bomb-scenario-and-its-tortured-logic / < / > [& # 8230;] < / p > 对酷刑和拘留发表评论。df65邀请读者评论 https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo/2009/09/25/torture-and-detention-an-invitation-for-readers-to-comment/comment-page-1/#comment-4 df65 星期一，2009年9月28日09:58:26 +0000 http://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo/?p=249#comment-4 我不得不说，我同意威廉的观点:在我看来，这封电子邮件确实犯了那种过度简化和不合理的错误，它指责Guantánamo博客…… 我不得不说，我同意威廉的观点:在我看来，这封电子邮件确实犯了那种过度简化和不合理的错误，它指责Guantánamo博客…

 评论“定时炸弹场景”及其酷刑禁令作为道德绝对的折磨逻辑| Guantánamo博客 https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo/2009/09/11/the-ticking-bomb-scenario-and-its-tortured-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-3 禁止酷刑作为道德的绝对原则|关塔纳摩的博客 星期二，9月15日15:42:18 +0000 http://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/cuba/?p=205#comment-3 […]a set of prerequisites almost as improbable as in the ticking-bomb scenario, which I argue against in another post. Furthermore, once you’re using the ‘reliable intel’ as a justification, the [...] 这是一组几乎和定时炸弹一样不可能的先决条件，我在另一篇文章中对此表示反对。此外，一旦你使用’可靠的情报’[…]

. 评论“定时炸弹场景”及其酷刑禁令作为道德绝对的折磨逻辑|古巴博客 https://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/guantanamo/2009/09/11/the-ticking-bomb-scenario-and-its-tortured-logic/comment-page-1/#comment-2 禁止酷刑作为道德的绝对原则|古巴博客 2009年9月15日星期二15:22:25 +0000 http://blogs.开云体育app客服kent.ac.uk/cuba/?p=205#comment-2 […]It would be impossible to assert that torture was used only for the acquisition of reliable intel without also admitting the collateral damage produced from torture where, for the reasons stated, reliable intel was not acquired. Therefore, even in the ‘reliable intel’ argument, we’re dealing with a set of prerequisites almost as improbable as in the ticking-bomb scenario, which I argue against in another post. [...] 断言酷刑只是用于获取可靠情报，而不承认酷刑造成的附带损害，由于上述原因，没有获得可靠情报，这是不可能的。因此，即使在“可靠的情报”的论点中，我们也在处理一组几乎不可能的先决条件，就像在定时炸弹的情况下一样，我在另一篇文章中反对这种情况。[& # 8230;] < / p >
Baidu
map