Tenth Meeting: A Special Event with Dr. Julian Hanich

Invitation to a specialPostgraduate Research & Early Career WorkshopwithDr. Julian Hanich, Assistant Professor of Film Studies, University of Groningen

Julian Hanich

“Reflecting Reflections: Notes on Complex Mirror Shots in Films”

10am-12pm* Thursday, 21 January 2016

Room: Jarman 7

Note: This event will kick off the winter term’sFilm Reading Group

*Followed by coffee in the Gulbenkian, University of Kent

[To sign up, put your name on thisDoodle Poll]

All PhD and MA students as well as early career researchers are warmly invited to this special research event. Julian Hanich is Assistant Professor of Film Studies at the University of Groningen. His expertise includes research in the areas:

Film and Emotion,Film and Phenomenology,Audience/Reception Studies,Genre Studies, andFilm Aesthetics

Following hisARC and CFMR Research Seminar scheduled for Wednesday 20 January, entitled,“I, You and We: Ideas for a Phenomenology of the Collective Cinema Experience”, Dr. Hanich has agreed to meet with PG and early career researchers for an informal gathering about his research and career the next day.

Thursday, 21 January 2016 from 10am-12pm, Dr. Hanich will give a 45-minute presentation entitled,“Reflecting Reflections: Notes on Complex Mirror Shots in Films,“followed by an open discussion.参与者被要求甲型肝炎e read his related paper entitled, “Complex Staging: The Hidden Dimensions of Roy Andersson’s Aesthetics“(Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism,2014), which can be downloadedhere.

The final half-hour will be reserved to discuss Dr. Hanich’s experience as anearly career researcher. This is a fantastic opportunity for PhDs and MAs interested in postgraduate and postdoctoral research. Abstract and full bio are available below.

Reflecting Reflections,Notes on Complex Mirror Shots in Films

A film scholar doing research on the term ‘mirror’ encounters four dominant domains in film studies. First, and most pervasively, there are countless studies employing the Lacanian concept of the mirror-stage, central to psychoanalytic film theory of the 1970s and 80s. Next, we find numerous publications using the word ‘mirror’ metaphorically: a film or group of films ‘mirrors’ or ‘reflects’ a culture, society, or historical period. Third, some studies interpret the mirror as a narrative motif and speculate about its meaning and signification. Finally, and more recently, cognitivist film scholars employ the concept of ‘mirror neurons’ to explain empathic processes.

However, little attention has been paid to what mirrors imply for the pictorial composition, the organization of filmic space and the spectator’s viewing activity in a given scene. This is what I will be interested in my presentation.

I will show that provided a mirror and its source of reflection assume a prominent role in the scene, they can change the way spectators lookonto, lookintoand lookbeyondthe filmic image, but also lookatit in puzzled or questioning ways. More concretely this implies that (1) complex mirror shots may modify how spectators lookontothe picture as a flat composition by way of a quasi-transformation of the screen shape. (2) They can function as a ‘magnetizing’ frame-within-the-frame that channels the viewer’s lookintothe ‘depth’ of the image. (3) By referring us to off-screen space and thus making us lookbeyondthe image, they also allow for an intricately layered experience of perception and imagination, complicating our cognitive effort to ‘read’ the image. (4) Mirrors may, finally, be a source of spatial complication and can even lead to a full-blown disorientation regarding the status of the image, thus transforming the way viewers understand, problematize and lookatthe filmic image as such.

Short CV

Julian Hanich is Assistant Professor of Film Studies at the University of Groningen. From 2009 to 2012 he held a position as postdoctoral research fellow at the interdisciplinary research center “Languages of Emotion” at the Freie Universität Berlin. He studied North American Studies and Film Studies in Berlin, Berkeley and Munich and was a visiting researcher at UCLA and the University of Amsterdam. In 2010 he published a monograph on the phenomenology of fear at the movies, entitledCinematic Emotion in Horror Films and Thrillers. The Aesthetic Paradox of Pleasurable Fear(Routledge). He also co-edited a volume of the German online journalNach dem FilmonLaughter in the Movie Theaterand a book on filmic suggestion and the viewer’s imagination entitledAuslassen, Andeuten, Auffüllen. Der Film und die Imagination des Zuschauers(芬克)。他的文章出现Screen,Projections,Necsus,Cinema Journal(forthcoming),Film-Philosophy,Movie, Jump Cut,The New Review of Film and Television Studies,Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts,Montage/AV,Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine KunstwissenschaftandAmerikastudien/American Studies.

Seehttp://julianhanich.com/andhttp://www.rug.nl/staff/j.hanich/

Ninth Meeting: Jean Mitry’sThe Film Image

Jean Mitry

What:Read and discuss a portion from Jean Mitry’sThe Film Image

When:Monday 23 Nov. 2015, 4:30-6:30pm

Where:Jarman Studio 7

Access:https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7WkAYBe7avrekhMNU5HUVdOZmc/view?ts=5639f60a

Jean Mitry is an often overlooked figure in the history of film theory. He was deeply imbedded in French film culture. He is credited as being a co-founder—along with Georges Franju and Henri Langlois—of the Cercle du cinéma film club, which would lead to the establishment of La Cinématheque française in 1938. Later, Mitry would become a major player in the institutionalization of film studies in France (and the world) and one of the first to teach university courses on film history and theory.

杜Esthetique等心理学电影(1963)是酒吧lished at a transitional time for film studies. More than just the introduction of film studies to university curriculums, the 1960s involved a paradigm shift in film theory towards semiotics—which in France was most notably influenced by Ferdinand de Saussure’s theories of semiology. Mitry’s book might be seen as a link between the classical film theorists Tsuch as Balazs and Arnheim and the film semioticians that would appear in the wake of Christian Metz’s writings. In this excerpt one can see aspects of Mitry’s attempt at a systematic theory of film aesthetics, with a focus on the psychology of the film experience and how one might understand film as a medium of symbolic expression(Jake Whritner 2015).

Sixth Meeting: Kendall Walton’s “Categories of Art” (1970)

MA Students, PhD Students, and Faculty are cordially invited to attend thisMonday 28 September 2015 4:30-6:30pm, Week 1.

We will be discussing Kendall Walton’s “Categories of Art.”

Kendall Walton

We will also be finalising the calendar for the first term, which intends to be every other week on Mondays from 4:30-6:30 Meeting room is Jarman 7.

Walton, Kendall. “Categories of Art.” The Philosophical Review, Vol. 79, No. 3 (Jul., 1970), pp. 334-367.

Fifth Meeting: Lea Jacob’sFilm Rhythm After Sound(2015)

Although this is a bi-weekly meeting and we aim to keep it that way, we have agreed that our next meeting will take place on Wednesday 27 May 2015 1:30-3:30pm (instead of the following week) to better accommodate the Film PGR WIP calendar and because we had to push back the previous meeting by one week.

Everyone is invited to attendWednesday 27 May 2015 1:30-3:30pmand we will be discussing a chapter fromLea Jacob’s bookFilm Rhythm After Sound: Technology, Music, and Performanceentitled, “Dialogue Timing and Performance in Hawks” (2015, University of California Press).

Lea Jacobs, Professsor of Film, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Recommended movies for this chapter areThe Dawn Patrol(IMDb),Scarface(IMDb), andTwentieth Century(IMDb) although it is not necessary to have seen these films prior to the meeting; we will be looking at some clips.

Here are some trailers and clips:

Scarface

The Dawn Patrol

Twentieth Century

Fourth Meeting: Daniel Yacavone’s电影的世界(2015)

We have agreed to read a portion ofDaniel Yacavone’s电影的世界: A Philosophical Aesthetics of Cinema(2015). If you intend to join, please let me know. We will be discussing the second chapter: The Framework of Worlds: Symbolization, Meaning, and Art. Please also read the introduction to the book.

We have also agreed to discuss a film alongside this reading:The Draughtsman Contract(dir. Peter Greenaway, 1982). So, if you have time, please watch/rewatch it.

We will be meeting from 1-3pm Wednesday 20 May 2015.

Dan Yacavone’s page at the University of Edinburgh

UPDATE: Meeting room is Darwin Lecture Theatre 3

Third Meeting: Four papers by Margrethe Bruun Vaage

For our third meeting, we have agreed to read some pieces byDr. Margrethe Bruun Vaage, who joined the University of Kent as a Lecturer in Film Studies in 2013.

All of these pieces should be available for student and faculty access in the Templeman Library’s online facilities.

Vaage, Margrethe Bruun. 2006. “The Empathic Film Spectator in Analytic Philosophy and Naturalized Phenomenology.”Film and Philosophy10: 21–38.

———. 2009a. “The Role of Empathy in Gregory Currie’s Philosophy of Film.”British Journal of Aesthetics49(2): 109–28.

———. 2009b. “Self-Reflection: Beyond Conventional Fiction Film Engagement.”Nordicom Review30(2): 159–78.

———. 2010. “Fiction Film and the Varieties of Empathic Engagement.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXXIV: 158-179.

Next meeting is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday 29 April 2015 from 2-4pm in Jarman Studio 6. All are welcome.

First Meeting: Hugo Münsterberg’sThe Photoplay

The Film Studies Reading Group is scheduled to have its first meeting onThursday at 2pm 2 April 2015. The Reading Group is a biweekly meeting (i.e. every other week), intended for all Postgrads (including MA and PhD students) and Faculty with an interest in reading primary literature within the realm of Film Studies.

For the first meeting, we have agreed to readHugo Münsterberg‘s 1916The Photoplay: A Psychological Study, which is available as a free .pdf, eBook, and Kindle from Project Gutenberg (http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/15383).

At the first meeting, the next readings will be discussed and agreed upon. Room is Jarman 5.

Links to Relevant Videos